Were the blocks to the Pyramid poured? Share | 123>LincolnGenghis posted:9/1/2011 9:03:29 PM I have been running across passing references about artificial stone usage in past ancient constructions for years. Most of the time the experts never follow thru on an explanation on this point and would continue going on about something else. I finally sat down last week and looked into this matter for myself to find out about it. In my searching I came accross the geopolymer institute. I got to tell you they have my vote, and the real world data and papers to back it up. So much for levitation or insanely big advanced machinery for moving solid blocks.Anyone interested in this I have the link down below. http://www.geopolymer.org/archaeology/introduction-why-an-archaeology-section-at-the-geopolymer-instituteI know those ancient construction workers had beer so I know how they unwound on their weekends off. But my question is this: Did they also whistle at and make nasty comments to women that happened to walk by their construction sites?Did they fake injuries to get comp claims?Did they call in sick on mondays and take off early on Fridays?You know mabe they were more like us than we think. spiritech0 posted:9/1/2011 11:17:39 PM They were more than we are right now. That's a damn shame ain't it? I mean, when was the last time you built a shopping mall sized set of structures that are guaranteed to survive up to a nuclear explosion? Hold on to your hard drives, cuz the cave graffitti will still be here.Omen502 posted:9/2/2011 4:45:48 AM Ok, I checked out the link. I think if they have enough evidence surely they do not show enough of it only text on screen, which seems to be opinion to me. The presence of air bubbles happens even in hardened lava. The fibers not so sure i would like to examine them under a microscope and see for myself as to thier findings and the fibers composite makeup and as what i have seen from the intitute proves to be only speculation to me. We do know where these limestone blocks were taken from. and if they were molded or poured then why not do it at the site of construction and not the same place where these materials where taken. Alchemy is a strong tool when knowledge allows it to be, but I have seen the stone of the pregnant mother which was never moved, just left lying at the place of its retrieval. Many other blocks left laying on the desert sand right next to thier place of origin. Why carry it. I could understand the power of alchemy being that I believe Hanibal used prcoesses of this possibly using heat, vinegar, and water to break down mountains in order for him to cross the alps with a herd of elephants and an army. It is possible to use alchemy but not so sure this was used like so in the building of the pyramids though I do not count it out. Maybe chisel the limestone or granite into "concrete dust" and mix it on the site of construction. I don't know. It is a valid option and therefore do not discredit it, but I do not see enough evidence to agree yet. We also have to be weary of institutes and schools and thier teachings. After all they tought me I came from a monkey through evolution and I feel this is not true. maybe mixed with prehistoric man through genetic manipulation. I am glad you brought this topic to the forum micheal and urge you to do more so. I do not know how they did it, I'm not sure anyone alive now does. Well maybe someone, secretly, silently, waiting. . . . With the knowledge of ancient wonders and magic. . .ready to use it again. . . when the time is right. . . for world domination. Everybody get ready I feel we might be in for a wild ride here in the near future.LincolnGenghis posted:9/2/2011 8:33:12 PM There is allot more to that site then what is on the surface and various links going off it.. If you dig deep enough in there they have the entire theory and how they think the construction methods were done. The easiest explanation to what I have found so far is that the raw materials were brought to site and evidentaly mixed there and poured into forms almost just like modern concrete building construction. They have even already created an identical artificial stone block to test their theories out.I guess all the people involved in that are really not that interested in the archeology of the whole thing, they are all industry profesionals and scientists who already take the artificial stone theory as a given and are trying to understand and impliment the technology in their own industries. I mean who would not want a building made out that stuff? the thing would last longer then any current concrete structures. I guess it is also kind of a green technology , not as many by products and way less pollution than concrete manufacturing.The whole thing would definately explain the perfect edges and perfect fits between the blocks on the pyramids. I mean hell in a liquid state the stuff would be self leveling like concrete. wavygravy7 posted:9/4/2011 9:57:23 AM Stone vitrification explains alot,but we do not know how to do this with the types of stone they used at many of these sites.Cusco,Peru looks like it was "poured" to me.This is very interesting and I don't hear alot of talk about it.gary107 posted:9/4/2011 1:17:38 PM the lime stones at Gaza were found to have human hairs inside of them, not so with the large stones in South America.LincolnGenghis posted:9/4/2011 3:57:19 PM Evidently those polymer researchers have known about this for years, there is even a product that one company has that is blatantly called Pyracrete (The Pyra is for Pyramid?). I think the biggest problem that is going on with this is that neither camp in archaeology(The Mainstream or the Fringe) wants to hear it, the are both too polarized in their beliefs.For mainstream it would force them to rewrite just about everything they know if it was proven that multiple sites on different continents that should not have been in contact with each were using the same geopolymer chemistry at the same time. It would be a smoking gun with with six spent shells in the chamber. They have always dismissed the similarties between South America and Egypt builds saying that the pyramid shape just made the most sense for early builders. But if they were using the same complicated artificial stone science that would be way more than chance.For the Fringe archeologists I think the explanation is not mysterious enough. If it does not involve aliens, levitation or magic prayersit does not sell enough books. I think what they would be missing the point on would be the actual complexities of the geopolymer science that the anchient builders seem to have been employing. That alone would point to some forgotten high technology that was lost until recent times. I mean holy S&*^ they were making artificial rock that has passed as the real thing to geologists for years.The one thing that it helped me to make sense of also that always bothered me was the holes that they were boring thru that stuff.They had a machinist on some show looking at one of the holes and the marks inside saying at the rate of feed of the device and the size of the hole that it could have only been made by an ultra sonic drill. (Well unless the stone had not hardened yet , in wet state you could have probably used a wood tube and turned it by hand.)wavygravy7 posted:9/6/2011 8:00:17 PM In Reply To:gary107 posted:9/4/2011 1:17:38 PM the lime stones at Gaza were found to have human hairs inside of them, not so with the large stones in South America.Yes but there is evidence of vitrification in South America.I wish that I had a link to the video I watched on this subject so that it could be linked.LincolnGenghis posted:11/29/2011 8:56:48 PM Had to dig up this old thread again. People are still insisting the pyramid blocks were carved. Link to construction theoryLincolnGenghis posted:11/29/2011 9:29:15 PM This video is kind of wild. Shows the Geopolymer people duplicating a pyramid block. LincolnGenghis posted:11/29/2011 9:36:47 PM LincolnGenghis posted:11/29/2011 9:56:07 PM breeld posted:12/1/2011 4:52:23 AM Wow, Michael, you jist busted muh bubble on them there aliens makin` them pyramids! lol j/k Actually, I didn`t know they had poured stone back then. Interesting, to say the least. But, I need proof! "Enquiring minds", you know lol I watched one of the vids, but I`m not much of a vid watcher-I`d much rather read it-soooo, I`ll be looking this up to read some more on it.spooky1 posted:12/1/2011 5:17:31 AM In Reply To:breeld posted:12/1/2011 4:52:23 AM Wow, Michael, you jist busted muh bubble on them there aliens makin` them pyramids! lol j/k Actually, I didn`t know they had poured stone back then. Interesting, to say the least. But, I need proof! "Enquiring minds", you know lol I watched one of the vids, but I`m not much of a vid watcher-I`d much rather read it-soooo, I`ll be looking this up to read some more on it.Hey nice to hear from u Breeld, its ur chum Spooky :) hows the healing going? I was so interested in these vidios. For I am a visual learner.as I was watching them I remembered as a kid I was obsessed with rocks &minerals but this topic brought it all back.think I'm gonna go collect some rocks nowbreeld posted:12/1/2011 10:21:45 AM Hi there Spooky! It`s going great! Most vids bore me. I read much faster than I can watch a vid, and get more out of it. Guess I just have no patience. lol Been re-doing my kitchen today, but when I get finished, I plan to do a little research on these rocks. (I`m just taking a little break now.) It`s really got me curious.LincolnGenghis posted:12/1/2011 10:58:07 AM In Reply To:breeld posted:12/1/2011 10:21:45 AM Hi there Spooky! It`s going great! Most vids bore me. I read much faster than I can watch a vid, and get more out of it. Guess I just have no patience. lol Been re-doing my kitchen today, but when I get finished, I plan to do a little research on these rocks. (I`m just taking a little break now.) It`s really got me curious.Here is the main site for the information you are seeking. GeopolymerSitebreeld posted:12/1/2011 12:22:24 PM Thanks, Michael- Gonna go there now.LincolnGenghis posted:12/1/2011 5:44:00 PM Yeah when I posted this, the intention was not to beat up on the alternative theories of construction. It was just after hearing every possible theory imaginable on the subject with everything from hand carving each stone to magic levitation crystals to aliens, this was the one that made the most sense to me. (And they seem to actually be backing it up with allot of studies and actual data.) : If this construction method is proven to be true I don't think it will steal away much of the fun mystery of the whole thing. In fact I think it will bring up a much greater mystery. They have started looking at sites in south America with some of the same construction theories in mind. If it is proven that Egypt and South America were using some of the same construction methods around the same time it throws the doors wide open to the people researching Alt, Mu, and Atlantis. (Whatever name they prefer for the possible lost civilization. It had numerous names in other cultures) breeld posted:12/2/2011 5:02:13 AM Ok, someone, in some post on here, had suggested reading about the coral castle. I did. Amazing! Anyway, the man that built it said he knew the ancient secret of building the pyramids, and apparently used that to build the castle. So do you think that was poured, too? or not?LincolnGenghis posted:12/2/2011 12:20:01 PM In Reply To:breeld posted:12/2/2011 5:02:13 AM Ok, someone, in some post on here, had suggested reading about the coral castle. I did. Amazing! Anyway, the man that built it said he knew the ancient secret of building the pyramids, and apparently used that to build the castle. So do you think that was poured, too? or not?I don't know I will have to look into that one. Cool Please log in or become a member to add a post.