Is Newgrange a representation of an ancient U.F.O? Share | 123>Jaxerback posted:9/3/2013 8:17:30 PM Newgrange,Ireland,thought to be about 5,000 yrs old.Apart from the alignments on the winter solstice,why was this impressive monument built...and who built it..and for what purpose? The main-stream theory would have us believe that it was a tomb for the leaders of the day,however only a relatively small number of remains were found in situ. Why did they make the monument circular?Why is Stonehenge circular?Why are modern day crop circles still turning up? White quartz stone was used for the outside of the monument..the same stone that was used for the casing blocks on the great pyramid...there is a connection. Could all these ancient accomplishments be attributed to an alien intervention? Or were our ancient ancestors just very clever? http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-europe-opinion-guest-authors/newgrange-and-boyne-valley-monuments-advanced-lunar My crazy theory is that all these circular and pyramidal monuments were built to represent the UFO'S that ancient people saw in the sky..and we are still seeing them...bobprin posted:9/4/2013 6:21:50 AM Good theory, don't forget the medicine wheel in montana. Personally, I think all these structures are related and that they are far older than believed.Jaxerback posted:9/7/2013 11:16:12 PM Upon reflection it makes perfect sense why the ancients should have put such veneration on the circle.They relied on both the sun and the moon as we do but to a greater extent.The cycles of the celestial bodies were magical,supernatural in fact,and,as a result they were probably worshipped as Gods.We see today the power that "faith" can wield.It can inspire great achievements and destroy without mercy at the same time. It could also be UFO's though.bobprin posted:9/8/2013 5:28:05 AM Maybe, but I think that the sun and moon are so common in occurance that there really isn't any need to build a monument to something you can point at and see. Again with the circle, it is too common. What wasn't common were disc shaped craft decending from the sky. Has anyone tried to check astrological alignments with crop circles? Keep in mind that the ancient monuments we see today are the ruins of what once was.Jaxerback posted:9/9/2013 8:37:34 PM There probably was a reason to build a monument to something you could actually see and know for certain actually existed. As opposed to the thousands of massive cathedrals,churches,mosques that were and still are being built for invisible "Gods!".bobprin posted:9/10/2013 6:32:28 AM Well we know that all those cathedrals and such were built to attract the money that even kings would contribute because of superstition and ignorance. So lets think for a minute. Moving massive blocks of stone. How? Why don't we know how it was done? We know how many things were done in ancient times. Fire building, weapon making, animal husbandry, etc etc. But we don't know how to move massive blocks of stone. Something that important and clever would almost certainly have been passed down just like arrowhead chipping. Perhaps because man didn't do it.gary107 posted:9/10/2013 9:15:23 AM The Egyptians claimed the food energy that allowed the ancient workers to move those stones came from the wheat they would sell to others at a price. Human hairs have been found inside those stones suggesting they were poured on site. The energy to build New York City comes from Iowa corn, we can give you a good price on our excess production, that is how we built the bridge to the Moon when we went there.gary107 posted:9/10/2013 9:15:24 AM The Egyptians claimed the food energy that allowed the ancient workers to move those stones came from the wheat they would sell to others at a price. Human hairs have been found inside those stones suggesting they were poured on site. The energy to build New York City comes from Iowa corn, we can give you a good price on our excess production, that is how we built the bridge to the Moon when we went there.gary107 posted:9/10/2013 9:15:24 AM The Egyptians claimed the food energy that allowed the ancient workers to move those stones came from the wheat they would sell to others at a price. Human hairs have been found inside those stones suggesting they were poured on site. The energy to build New York City comes from Iowa corn, we can give you a good price on our excess production, that is how we built the bridge to the Moon when we went there.Jaxerback posted:9/12/2013 9:22:43 PM I believe that a lot of ancient monuments were created using "poured blocks".It is the only way it makes any sense.gary107 posted:9/12/2013 9:54:06 PM but what of the myths of slave instead of farm labourers? you bring into question the holy script of some people. I, myself, believe that the Moses myth was not real and it was just a clever effort by Egyptian priests to make a buffer state between Egypt and Assyria by creating a new sort of Semite by trimming off a little skin. I never explained these suspicions to my 97 year old Jewish uncle who died earlier this year. there is much in the way the historical record is written that does suggest this is what occurred.LincolnGenghis posted:9/12/2013 11:42:27 PM There are more secretive agendas hidden in the old testement than just that. Allot of the old testament is a cryptic piece that was ripped off from the sumerians. Allot of the charactors in the book I believe are more figurative in nature then real. There is a larger hidden message in that lore. There are some historical gems hidden in that book in plain sight also.gary107 posted:9/14/2013 2:01:13 PM what are the other secretive agendas and cryptic writing you suggest?LincolnGenghis posted:9/14/2013 7:15:30 PM When you dig into some areas of the old testament there are most definately some odd things in there. in genesis you have a fairly accurate description of the Big Bang, the earth forming , the seas , animals and man. It is actually accurate in that it is basically the same order of things that scientists today would agree with. although it is a simplistic piece, the original writer had it right. Another weird thing that seems to be gathering some traction recently with researchers is that the bible has various references to neandertals in it. Yeah I know its a head scratcher but I think there may be some validity to the theory when I started to look into it. Jacob and Esau and also Cain and Able in the theory are not single specific individules but rather a metaphor for modern humans and neandertals. going back into the old testement with that in mind and starting to plug that Idea into various stories yields some very strange posibilities. It kind of leads to another spectulation. What actually is original sin and how can all of us be born with it? I know the short answer on that goes back to adam and eve and eating off the tree of knowledge. Blahh blahh blahh. There is another possibility that original sin was the wiping out of an entire race by us and our treachery. Maybe the metephorical tree of knowledge was not really a tree and stood for a race of people. Canabilism would certainly rank up there as a bad sin. :)Jaxerback posted:9/14/2013 10:56:06 PM http://www.learning-mind.com/new-theory-claims-humans-were-designed-by-aliens/bobprin posted:9/15/2013 8:45:51 AM Interesting, but no details. The thought that dna code resembles some form of language is not new. There was a statement made in the article when the dna code was first discovered. I did not know that kaskastan had scientists, learn something everyday.gary107 posted:9/15/2013 1:51:17 PM it was part of the former Soviet Union and far enough away from Moscow that should anything go wrong... Let us put the A-bomb project out in New Mexico... that kind of reasoning.scardycat posted:9/15/2013 3:13:30 PM Ya no when I was in one of the mental hosp. they actually had bible study. as I believe in god & jesus I stayed. I fell a lot of the stories r metaphores(if I spelled that rite I will shit my pants) a lot of people take the bible word for word. I think there's a lot more to it. I really want to read the bibleJaxerback posted:9/15/2013 3:25:34 PM Good news!You wont be shitting your pants.LincolnGenghis posted:9/15/2013 3:25:39 PM I just find it funny that people can jump right from A to Z in their logic without having a systematic chain of evidence that fills in everything in between.The true devil is in the details and the very notion of being able to say with any reasonable accuracy that we were created by aliens is just not there for now. And on the flip side of that the current model hypothesis of evolution is actually kind of falling apart more everyday with new findings and dates shattering existing statements. Basically there is something missing from both the alien camp of thought and the conservative evolution camp of thought. Me I have always been interested in B through Y because that is where the real truth will be found. I think we have a far more remarkable past then anyone would believe and it would not necessarily have to involve Aliens or the Current model Hypothesis of evolution. From a pure science or courtroom approach neither of those two sides actually have the evidence necessary to prove their cases. I do like great brainstorming Ideas though that are outside of the box. But they really can't be used to absolutely prove something without hard data to back them up. Great for speculation purposes though. I love weird stuff. :) Please log in or become a member to add a post.